Catholic Healthcare West Ends Ties with Church as Part of Business Conversion

Catholic Healthcare West shed more than words when the 38-hospital system changed its name to Dignity Health. It dropped its formal connection to the Roman Catholic Church.

San Francisco-based CHW envisioned a system with hospitals coast to coast, beyond its three-state region of Arizona, California and Nevada. To realize that vision, the system on Jan. 23 introduced the new name and the restructuring of its governance to separate from the church. Officials cited enhanced opportunities to expand, saying separating from the church would make the system more attractive to executives from secular or non-Catholic hospitals that are looking for an investor.“What this does is two things: it removes the words ‘Catholic’ and ‘West’ from its name; I think the intention is for broadening the pool of affiliations,” said Brad Spielman, a vice president and senior analyst for Moody’s Investors Service.

The former CHW counts itself as the fifth-largest Catholic system in the country based on revenue, and whether other systems follow suit in an effort to grow remains to be seen. Still, CHW’s conversion poses the latest example of a faith-based system taking drastic actions to position itself for impending healthcare reform and the business demands of the future.

Most observers aren’t surprised, but also wonder if the system’s mission and values have evolved to the point where they were forced to separate. “They view it as removing the ball and chain from themselves,” said Paul Danello, a Washington-based lawyer focused on Catholic canon law.As a growing number of laypeople continue to be involved in leadership, some question whether the Catholic way will remain a feasible way of doing business.

Lawrence Singer, director of the Beazley Institute for Health Law and Policy at Loyola University, a Jesuit school in Chicago, and his colleagues envision a time when compliance with ethical and religious directives could hamstring Catholic hospitals attempting to conduct business in the modern age. “Are we getting to a point where either government policy in the Affordable Care Act or community demand for certain services is such that Catholic healthcare providers won’t effectively be able to compete or serve their market any longer?” Singer said.

Looking to expand eastward

Dignity Health President and CEO Lloyd Dean declined to discuss any pending deals that may have served as motivation for the restructuring, but did say the system is looking to expand east. He also said there’s no “one-size-fits-all” remedy for all Catholic systems. But this one, he said, gives Dignity Health the flexibility to ally with a larger number of organizations.“What I can tell you is, this is the right model for us and it allows us to partner with others whose values who are in sync with our mission, vision and organization,” Dean said.

Dignity Health now has 23 Catholic and 15 non-Catholic hospitals.

Dignity Health officials planted the seeds for a name change in 2010, when CHW released its vision statement for the next decade. Besides making bold goals of expanding, the system listed “dignity” as the first of five core values and described aspirations of developing a “vibrant national healthcare system” by the end of 2020.

“We will grow our healing ministry by expanding access and market share within existing service areas, entering new service areas, and significantly expanding our community-based wellness, ambulatory and nonacute services,” the report, titled Horizon 2020, stated.

Dignity Health officials are quick to point out that they aren’t severing all ties to the church. Dean said the church’s values will remain important at the system’s Catholic and non-Catholic hospitals. The system will continue to prohibit most reproductive services at its existing facilities, regardless of the hospital’s affiliation, allowing only sterilizations at its non-Catholic facilities.“I would say our vision has not changed and neither has our mission as being a voice for the voiceless, serving those in need of quality healthcare,” Dean said.

That’s a statement supported by the Washington, D.C.-based Catholic Health Association. “We do not see it as separating from the church; they worked this corporate structure out in consultation with many bishops,” CHA President and CEO Sister Carol Keehan wrote in an e-mailed statement.

A changing climate is forcing Catholic healthcare organizations to make changes. Earlier this month, the largest Catholic care group in America, 76-hospital Ascension Health, St. Louis, split into two (Jan. 9). The Ascension Health Alliance will manage support services and subsidiaries, while Ascension Health concentrates on hospital operations and healthcare delivery. Last year, Ascension formed a for-profit partnership with private-equity firm Oak Hill Capital Partners that intends to buy struggling Catholic providers and keep them Catholic (See related story).

Blazing a trail?

Sister Judy Carle, Dignity Health’s board vice chair, said CHW leaders discussed splitting the system into non-Catholic and Catholic components, but concluded that would go against the system’s belief in inclusivity. CHW has been the rare group with both non-Catholic and Catholic hospitals. However, Danello predicted that other Catholic systems would follow Dignity Health’s lead, and that three out of the other top five Catholic healthcare organizations would do so in the next two to four years.

Dignity Health has not acquired a hospital since 2007, when it added St. Mary’s Regional Medical Center in Reno, Nev., and the system has been searching for a buyer for that 269-bed hospital.

A published report quoted Dean saying officials from non-Catholic hospitals interested in affiliating with CHW seemed reluctant about joining a Catholic system, worried that they’d have to become Catholic. [Read more...]

LinkedInShare

New California Nursing Graduates Find it Hard to Get Hired

Reported by the Sacramento Bee

Barbara Elwell wanted a midlife career switch from medical billing to nursing. Since graduating in May, the Marin County resident has applied as far away as Georgia and interviewed as far away as Texas.

Barbara Elwell is trained in nursing, but can't find a job. Some new nursing graduates are seeking unpaid positions to gain a foothold in the field.

That’s because Elwell has had no luck with hospitals in Sacramento, Stockton, Modesto or the Bay Area. Now she’s almost ready to throw up the white flag in her job search.

“We’re stuck between a rock and a hard place,” said Elwell, who has been tutoring high school students in math and science since she earned her two-year associate degree from the College of Marin. “We’ve gone through all these classes and this training, and yet, I’m a licensed RN in this country, and I can’t find a job.”

California has spent at least $95 million in federal, state and private funds in the past decade to double the number of nursing graduates by expanding college programs and grants. As recently as three years ago, hospitals were offering moving expenses, housing allowances and signing bonuses to recent graduates of nursing schools.

But today, some new grads are happy to be offered an unpaid internship. That’s because fewer nurses are retiring during the recession, and hospitals are saving money by turning to veteran or temporary nurses who don’t need expensive training.

This leaves many new graduates in a Catch-22: They can’t get hired without at least one to two years of experience, and they are hard-pressed to gain experience unless they volunteer or take part-time jobs that might not fit their skills.

Hospitals “see this very, very large idle pool of labor,” said Timothy Bates, a program analyst at the Center for the Health Professions at the University of California, San Francisco. “They don’t see the incentives to reach that point yet where they take them on in anticipation of an expected increased demand.”

The nursing shortage will return during the next decade as the economy picks up, boomers begin to retire and California’s insured population grows, Bates said. The current oversupply of nurses could eventually worsen that shortage if nursing winds up looking less attractive as a profession.

[Read more...]

LinkedInShare

Physician Shortage Could Hinder Califorina’s Bridge to Reform Program

Over the next few years, California’s Bridge to Reform program aims to provide medical coverage for thousands of uninsured state residents, but officials say it will not address the shortage of primary care and specialty physicians, HealthyCal reports.

Background

The Bridge to Reform Medi-Cal waiver is a joint state and federal program that aims to help California prepare for wider implementation of the federal health reform law in 2014. Medi-Cal is California’s Medicaid program.

The bridge program provides matching federal funds to counties for health care spending for low-income, uninsured adults.

Physician Shortage Concerns

The program calls for patients to have a primary care physician and for follow-up care that includes medications and lab tests to stave off potentially costly emergency treatment.

However, county officials say a shortage of primary and specialty care physicians will make it more difficult to meet the needs of those who will receive health coverage under Bridge to Reform and in 2014 under an expansion of the federal health reform law.

Mary Ann Lee, managing director of the Stanislaus County Health Services Agency, said there have been difficulties trying to recruit physicians under Bridge to Reform in part because “reimbursements (for Medi-Cal) are lower than many other states and the unemployment is higher, so there is higher uncompensated care.”

Ken Cohen, director of health care services at San Joaquin County Health Care Services, said his county has ”a significant manpower shortage,” adding that more physicians practice in Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Jose.

Cost Concerns

County officials also have expressed concerns about whether the cost of adding patients and expanding coverage would exceed the amount of federal funds received.

If so, many counties that already are facing budget challenges would have to cover the extra costs of providing health care (Moran, HealthyCal, 7/20).

For more coverage on California’s Bridge to Reform Medicaid waiver, see  California’s Healthline’s Feature article of the Day.

Article source from California Healthline
LinkedInShare

New Bill Would Take Over Major Risk Medical Insurance Program Money

The legislative season has begun, with dozens of bills moving through committees this week.

The Senate Health Committee this week approved a measure designed to increase the number of physicians, nurses and allied health professionals in California — just when demand for those jobs may be at its highest point.

“SB 635 would direct money that is currently going to MRMIP (Major Risk Medical Insurance Program), which is being phased out by national health care reforms,” according to Senate member Ed Hernandez (D-Los Angeles), author of the bill and head of the Health Committee. “The money funding MRMIP can be spent now on the vital job of increasing the health care work force in California.”

That’s especially important starting in 2014, Hernandez said, because the demand for primary care providers is expected to spike — particularly in underserved communities — and that’s where some of that workforce training money could go.

Gail Blanchard-Saiger of the California Hospital Association said this bill is going to be critical, given the current dearth of providers in the state, on top of the increased demand.

“California is not going to have the medical providers, particularly in the allied health fields,” Blanchard-Saiger said. “The state will need to train 1 million health care workers by 2013. That’s doctors, nurses and a vast array of allied health fields.”

It’s an attractive idea right now, she said, because it doesn’t require any additional expense incurred by the state. “It is much-needed funding for workforce training,” she said, “without any added money from California.”

The time to plan for the national health care reform law is now “because 2014 is right around the corner,” Hernandez said. “This law will be one small part of trying to get more primary care providers and nurses into underserved areas.”

Article Source California Healthline

LinkedInShare

Violence in Hosptials: Assembly Panel Provides Initial OK for Bill To Boost Hospital Security

On Tuesday, California’s Assembly Committee on Health gave preliminary approval to a bill (AB 30) that aims to strengthen security at hospitals and increase requirements for reporting hospital-based violence to the state, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Assembly member Mary Hayashi (D-Hayward) and the California Nurses Association sponsored the legislation. According to CNA, violence against health workers has become a growing problem in the state.

However, the California Hospital Association opposes AB 30, saying it would burden hospitals with new requirements that might not provide any benefits.

The legislation will go the Assembly Committee on Appropriations before going to the full Assembly (Garrison, Los Angeles Times, 3/23).


Take our poll!

Share your opinion on the topic of increasing violence on healthcare workers and patients in Hospitals.

 

Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.

LinkedInShare

Federal Judge To Rule on Motion To Block Medi-Cal Rate Freeze

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Frank Damrell said he will rule this week on the California Hospital Association’s motion for an injunction that would block a planned freeze on Medi-Cal reimbursement rates for inpatient care, the Sacramento Bee reports. Medi-Cal is California’s Medicaid program.

Background

In October 2010, the state Legislature froze Medi-Cal reimbursement rates at the July 1, 2010 level for an indefinite period of time.

The rate freeze initially was scheduled to take effect on February 1, but a temporary restraining order has delayed its implementation.

Hospitals and state officials agree the freeze would reduce hospitals’ Medi-Cal reimbursements by about $169 million annually, compared with the level the rates would have risen to without the freeze (Walsh, Sacramento Bee, 2/26).

In addition to cutting costs, state officials said the freeze would provide a fixed baseline for Medi-Cal reimbursements while the state develops and implements a new rate schedule.

CHA Response

Attorneys for CHA said the state could develop a new Medi-Cal rate schedule without freezing reimbursement levels.

The attorneys also argued that the state failed to obtain proper federal approval for the rate changes (Walsh, Sacramento Bee, 2/25).

Article source: CaliforniaHealthline.org

LinkedInShare

Calif. Nurses Association Says Health Plans Denied 26% of Claims Last Year

California’s largest health insurers denied an average of one in four claims during the first three quarters of last year, according to a new report by the California Nurses Association/National Nurses United, KPBS’ “KPBS News” reports.

CNA/NNU said the report is based on data that health insurers provided to state regulators (Goldberg, “KPBS News,” KPBS, 2/1).  The Institute of Health and Socio-Economic Policy, CNA/NNU’s research arm, conducted the study.

Key Findings

According to the report, seven health plans denied 26% of all submitted claims — or 13.1 million claims — during the first three quarters of 2010. The figure is a slight decrease from the 26.8% claim denial rate for 2009.

For the first three quarters of 2010, the claim denial rates for California’s leading insurers were:

  • 43.9% for PacifiCare;
  • 39.6% for Cigna;
  • 27.3% for Anthem Blue Cross;
  • 24.1% for Health Net;
  • 21.9% for Blue Shield of California;
  • 20.2% for Kaiser Permanente; and
  • 5.9% for Aetna.

The report found that Cigna showed the biggest one-year increase in its claim rejection rate, which jumped by 5.3% from 2009. Kaiser Permanente had the largest one-year decline in its claim denial rate, which dropped by 7.4% from 2009.

Accounting for Eligibility of Claims

Don DeMoro, CNA/NNU research director, said insurers did not distinguish between “eligible” and “ineligible” claims denied in the data they provided to the California Department of Managed Health Care. DeMoro said such information would have allowed for more thorough analyses of the claims data (Anderson, Healthcare Finance News, 2/1).

Health insurers said they pay most eligible claims. They added that some claims might be denied if they involve services that are not covered benefits or patients that no longer are members of a plan (“KPBS News,” KPBS, 2/1).

LinkedInShare

Job Growth in California’s Healthcare Sector Slowing to a Crawl Amid Ongoing Recession

Although health care previously was a robust sector of California’s economy, the state now is experiencing a slowdown in the growth of health care jobs.

Many residents who lost their jobs and their employer-based health coverage during the recession have opted to delay or forgo certain medical services. The decline in demand for health services has contributed to a lower demand for health workers.

In a California Healthline Special Report by Kelly Wilkinson, experts discussed the challenges facing new graduates of nursing schools and medical schools.

The Special Report includes comments from:

  • Deloras Jones, executive director of the California Institute for Nursing and Healthcare;
  • Dylan Roby, assistant professor of health services at the UCLA School of Public Health; and
  • Neeraj Sood, associate professor and director of international programs at the University of Southern California’s Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics (Wilkinson, California Healthline, 1/14).

The complete transcript of this Special Report is available as a PDF.

Listen to Audio Report at California Healthline Running Time: 5:09

LinkedInShare

Insurance Commissioner Jones Calls for Blue Shield To Delay Planned Rate Increases

On Thursday, Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones (D) sent a letter urging Blue Shield of California to delay controversial rate hikes for at least 60 days after they are scheduled to take effect on March 1, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Jones said he wants to investigate Blue Shield’s plan to raise premiums for nearly 200,000 individual policyholders through a series of three rate hikes. The cumulative increases could total as much as 59% for some policyholders (Helfand, Los Angeles Times, 1/6).

Rate Hike Details

On Oct. 1, 2010, Blue Shield imposed premium increases averaging 18% and as high as 29% (California Healthline, 1/6). The insurer then raised rates by an average of 1% on Jan. 1.

Earlier this week, Blue Shield announced plans to hike premiums by an average of 30% on March 1 (Calvan, Sacramento Bee, 1/7).

The insurer said its premium increases stem from rising health care costs, increased use of services and more members dropping coverage during the recession. It also said its rates comply with a new federal requirement mandating that insurers must spend at least 80% of premium revenue on medical care (Los Angeles Times, 1/6).

Jones Responds

As the state’s insurance commissioner, Jones can work to ensure that health plans comply with the requirement to spend at least 80% of premium revenue on medical care. However, he does not have the authority to block rate increases.

Jones said, “We’ve seen 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 percent increases year over year, and it underscores why I need the authority to be able to reject excessive premium increases” (Colliver, San Francisco Chronicle, 1/7).

Sebelius Weighs In

In a statement responding to Blue Shield’s announcement, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said, “The people of California have a right to be concerned when they see this kind of rate increase month after month.”

She added that consumers would see more rate increases “without public scrutiny” if the federal health reform law were repealed (Mohajer, AP/San Jose Mercury News, 1/6).

Proposed Bill Would Boost Insurance Regulation

In related news, Democrats in the California Legislature say the controversy over Blue Shield’s premium increases could help rally support behind a new bill (AB 52), by Assembly member Mike Feuer (D-Los Angeles).

The legislation would authorize the insurance commissioner to approve or reject health insurance rate hikes in the same way that he regulates automobile and homeowner insurance policies (Los Angeles Times, 1/6).

For additional coverage of Feuer’s bill, see today’s Capitol Desk post.

LinkedInShare